Imprint
en
de

Insight Blog

How customers´inner motivation to regularly charge their car can be unleashed? Mobility as export good How much Germans value their data and who they choose to share it with Prof. Dr. Andreas Herrmann amongst the most influential economists in Switzerland “Master in Management” again 1st Rank in Financial Times Ranking! Automated Product Suggestions with Needs-based Configurators New Podcast Series “New Mobility Planet” with Andreas Herrmann & Björn Bender (SBB) Smart Mobility: Andreas Herrmann as expert for “Tagesspiegel Background” Great ICI presence at ACR and AOM Conferences 2020 When Products Become Autonomous—Recommendations for Adoption Self-Driving Cars Are Set to Revolutionize Urban Mobility Tunnels in Switzerland – Climate sinner? The car system: Germany and the reinvention of mobility Swiss Influencer Marketing Report 2020 How to foresee shocks, surprises, and pandemics? Leading in uncertain times Podcast on “Mobility-as-a-Service” “Die Produktion der Konsumgesellschaft” Autonomous vehicles – a remedy for today’s traffic burden? Modi-Covid19: Bio-Economic and -Politics Simulation How do “autonomous shopping systems” change the future of shopping? No more rumination and procrastination! Here´s how to lead yourself from Intention to Action! How will the global electric vehicle market look like in 2035 and will it be sustainable? Forbes: “One thing people love even more than winning money: not losing it!” How to Succeed on the Road to Digital Transformation: Agile and User-Centered Software Development Less Traffic Jams thanks to fewer Cars How smart is Switzerland? How to boost sales based on weather? “OPINION LEADERS & BRANDING” – THE ROLE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF OPINION LEADERS FOR BRANDS Once again…University of St. Gallen ranks fourth in Financial Times ranking! Innovation for Transformation – Challenges of Ambidexterity in the Automotive Industry Prof. Dr. Andreas Herrmann appointed Visiting Professor@LSE Rail journeys with additional costs Being one in a Million – the value of uniqueness in mass-customized products Future needs origin: Transformation strategies in the automotive industry Deutsche Telekom: From a public company to a magenta-colored experience What are the real CO2 emitters among the means of transportation? The glass consumer in the age of smart products How do we want to live in ten years? What is really important on the way to autonomous driving? The Digital Behavior Change Journey – How does digital organizational transformation work? Research: MAKE IT HAPPEN – Clarity and agency in times of unlimited possibility

Automated Product Suggestions with Needs-based Configurators

This article introduces a consumer-oriented approach to the future of automated product suggestions. It investigates a new type of product configurator: so-called needs-based configurators (NBCs). Such configurators analyze consumers’ product-related needs and create analysis-based automated product suggestions. Johanna Hasenmaile and Philipp Scharfenberger discuss the specific qualities of NBCs and show why automated product suggestion systems potentially simplify product choices (especially for consumers with little product knowledge). Their 10 recommendations for action are relevant for practitioners and future research alike. By Johanna Hasenmaile

 

 

Imagine buying a new car, yet feeling you lack product knowledge. You visit your preferred manufacturer’s website, select your choice vehicle from a vast range, and navigate key features (e.g., drive variants, the vehicle’s exterior and interior), each comprising dozens of subcategories with several hundred choices. How do you feel?

Increasingly complex product portfolios are requiring many companies to find new ways of efficiently suggesting the right product to consumers. One key tool for meeting this challenge is product configurators. Mass customization toolkits enable consumers to customize products (e.g., sneakers, cars) online. Customization, however, can be extensive, particularly for complex products. Even rather simple products (e.g., cereals) offer consumers up to 566 quadrillion configuration possibilities (mymuesli, 2020).

Most traditional configurators rest on attribute-based choice architectures. These enable choosing from diverse product attributes, based on which the customized product is developed (Hildebrand, Häubl, & Herrmann, 2014; Huffman & Kahn, 1998). Previous studies have focused largely on attribute-based configurators (ABCs) and discussed the advantages (Schreier, 2006) and limits of mass customization systems (Zipkin, 2001). Customizing each and every attribute can be onerous (Hildebrand et al., 2014), may entail feature fatigue (Thompson, Hamilton, & Rust, 2005), and probably fails to satisfy every consumer. This poses a major challenge for companies with complex product portfolios: How might future systems be designed to refocus attention on the buying experience and to make sales more fun and efficient? How can companies optimize the complex matching process between highly diverse customers and manifold product offerings?

In cooperation with Audi AG, Johanna Hasenmaile and Philipp Scharfenberger investigated a new type of product configurator: needs-based configurators (NBCs). Such configurators analyze product-related needs and then create automated product suggestions (Randall, Terwiesch, & Ulrich, 2007). In their Marketing Review St. Gallen article, they embed NBCs theoretically and develop specific recommendations for their utilization based on a qualitative study and a best-practice analysis.

 

Recommendations for Action

#1: Position NBCs prominently and as a new, entertaining, fast, intuitive, and uncomplicated means of configuration beside traditional attribute-based configurators (ABCs).

#2Provide clear instructions on which configuration type provides the best starting point. Guide consumers with high expertise to the ABC, those with low expertise to the NBC.

#3: Limit the number of questions and offer additional topics that enable optional customization.

#4: Include questions in your NBC that ensure novices receive a high perceived recommendation fit. Make sure all questions are actually needs-based (e.g., ask about travel habits instead of fuel type).

#5: Integrate info buttons and a chat function for further information.

#6: A mobile-optimized website is best suited to an NBC. Visualize technical details and enable users to skip steps.

#7: Communicate pricing transparently and clearly establish what is included in the price. Include a budget question and different financing options (lease or purchase). This can also help convert leads to sales.

#8: Show three different model recommendations that match the stated needs. Be transparent and highlight which needs are (or are not) considered and explain how the answers to previous questions lead to these recommendations.

#9: Program and test all algorithms very carefully.

#10: Clearly highlight the next steps (e.g., continue your configuration or contact your dealer) to reduce configuration terminations and integrate a call to action to convert leads into sales.

 

Acknowledgments

This research was conducted in cooperation with Dieter Kopitzki, Head of Development/Rollout Digital Retail Modules and Configurator at AUDI AG. The authors wish to thank AUDI AG for granting permission to publish the results and insights of this study.

 

More Information

References

Audi (2020). Modellempfehlung. Retrieved from https://www.audi.de/de/brand/de/modellempfehlung.html

Hildebrand, C., Häubl, G., & Herrmann, A. (2014). Product Customization via Starting Solutions. In Journal of Marketing Research, 51,6, pp. 707-725. 

Huffman, C., & Kahn, B. E. (1998). Variety for Sale: Mass Customization or Mass Confusion? In Journal of Retailing, 74, 4, pp. 491-513. 

Mymuesli (2020). Discover our diverse range of products. Retrieved from https://uk.mymuesli.com/about-us

Randall, T., Terwiesch, C., & Ulrich, K. T. (2007). Research Note—User Design of Customized Products. In Marketing Science, 26, 2, pp. 268-280. 

Schreier, M. (2006). The value increment of mass-customized products: an empirical assessment. In Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5, 4, pp. 317-327. 

Thompson, D. V., Hamilton, R. W., & Rust, R. T. (2005). Feature Fatigue: When Product Capabilities Become Too Much of a Good Thing. In Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 4, pp.431-442. 

Zipkin, P. (2001). The Limits of Mass Customization. In MIT Sloan Management Review,42, 3, pp. 81-87.